Study goals
To explore the role of autonomy as a moderator in the relationship between project managers’ goal orientations—specifically Learning Goal Orientation (LGO), Performance Goal Orientation (PPGO), and Avoidance Goal Orientation (PAGO).
Relevance / originality
Expand the existing literature on project management by providing an understanding of the moderation of autonomy, the relationship between goal orientations and project success. Highlight the complexities of these dynamics, and practical insights for successful outcomes.
Methodology / approach
The research uses confirmatory theory applying statistical methods, OLS regression and the Johnson-Neyman technique, to analyze empirical data. The study evaluates three constructs: goal orientations, autonomy and dimensions of success, through an online survey with 328 project managers.
Main results
Learning Goal Orientation increases customer impact, particularly when moderated by higher levels of autonomy. Performance Avoidance Goal Orientation negatively impacts project efficiency with autonomy providing only partial mitigation.
Theoretical / methodological contributions
Understanding the moderating role of autonomy in the relationship between goal orientations and project success can help organizations design better management practices, particularly in assigning roles and responsibilities aligned with project managers' motivational tendencies.
Social / management contributions
Expand existing literature and provide an understanding of autonomy moderation, the relationship between goal orientations and project success. Highlight the complexities of these dynamics and practical insights to foster environments that support successful outcomes.