Study goals
Investigate which ESG attributes are most valued by investors and how they align with the priorities of Brazilian companies in the ISE B3, using Critical Success Factors to identify convergences and gaps in corporate communication and strategy.
Relevance / originality
The study contributes by highlighting misalignments between corporate discourse and market expectations, addressing the ESG communication gap in Brazil. Applying Critical Success Factors offers a novel approach to structuring and comparing priorities between companies and investors.
Methodology / approach
Qualitative-quantitative approach: documentary analysis of the Reference Forms of 15 ISE B3 companies and a survey with 145 investors. Thematic analysis and descriptive/inferential statistics were used to map patterns of communication and perception of ESG attributes.
Main results
Identified asymmetry between corporate communication and the relevance attributed by investors, especially in climate, energy, cybersecurity, and governance. Investors value environmental and social practices more than companies report. Women show greater sensitivity to all three pillars, especially Social.
Theoretical / methodological contributions
Integrates the Critical Success Factors perspective into ESG studies, enabling a structured comparative analysis between declared and perceived priorities. Advances understanding of materiality and the use of integrated metrics to align stakeholder and corporate expectations.
Social / management contributions
Provides input to improve the communication and effectiveness of ESG practices, strengthening credibility and strategic alignment. Guides managers to prioritize material topics valued by investors and society, enhancing positive socio-environmental impact.